President Obama Says His Administration Has The Highest Ethics

Obama And His Administration Has NO Ethics

Being ethical is clearly not a matter of following one's feelings. A person following his or her feelings may recoil from doing what is right. In fact, feelings frequently deviate from what is ethical. What, then, is ethics? Ethics is two things. First, ethics refers to well based standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues.

For example, ethics refers to those standards that impose the reasonable obligations to refrain from rape, stealing, murder, assault, slander, lying, and fraud. Ethical standards also include those that enjoin virtues of honesty, compassion, and loyalty. Ethical standards include standards relating to rights, such as the right to life, the right to freedom from injury, and the right to privacy. Such standards are adequate standards of ethics because they are supported by consistent and well founded reasons.

Ethics also means, then, the continuous effort of studying our own moral beliefs and our moral conduct, and striving to ensure that we, and the institutions we help to shape, live up to standards that are reasonable and solidly-based.  By these standards Obama has no ethics.  Socialist Obama lives by the standard the ends justify the means and that is not ethical.

President Barack Hussein Obama signed an executive order and says his administration will have the highest of ethics.  The next day he appoints a lobbyist to a high defense position.  Because you are a lobbyist doesn’t mean you don’t have high ethics, so as far as lobbyist in Obama’s administration there naturally will be exceptions.

Those who have been lobbyists at this point are not the problem.  Socialist Obama has shown his administration has NO ethics with other nominations he has made.  These nominations show a total lack of ethics.  They show what SpeakNowAmerica has said in past entries.  Socialist Obama, see associations do matter. 

Look at some of President Obama’s nominees.  Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM) removed his name from nomination because of possible play for pay.  Richardson’s PAC’s are being investigated after contributions from a contractor who had been awarded a contract that they weren’t the best qualified for.  We have Eric Holder the democrat nominated by socialist Obama to be Attorney General.  Holder is the Asst. Attorney General who advised Clinton in his final days to pardon financier Marc Rich who was also an arms dealer.  It also might be added Rich’s wife contributed heavily to Clinton.

Timothy Geithner another democrat has been nominated by socialist Obama to be Secretary of Treasury / IRS.  Geithner is a tax evader and it appears lied to the Senate committee.  Geithner took the money from IMF to cover his taxes due, signed documents he owed the taxes, and told the committee it was an honest mistake.  As bad or worse is Obama’s defense of this tax evader. 

America, socialist Obama says his administration will have the highest of ethics.  From his past associations we know Obama has no ethics.  Some of his nominees thus far show Obama has no ethics.  For socialist Obama any means justifies his socialist ends.

Comment here and email us at
YourVoice@speaknowamerica.org. Help us and be part of bringing our Great country back.   We are ready to defend our rights and tell the truth the socialist main stream media won’t tell you.

Speak Now America! we want to hear from you.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 1/28/2009 12:06 PM NoDoze wrote:
    B. Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro, has already shown himself to be the least ethical person to ever seek, much less hold, the office of U.S. President. He spent some $800,000 to cover up the fact that he is not qualified to hold the office. He met privately with 8 of the Supreme Court justices just before his inauguration. Add to that the items mentioned in the above article, and I challenge you to find a more unethical person anywhere -- much less as President. The Clintons were certainly sleazy and crooked, but they were amateurs compared to this guy.
    Reply to this
  • 1/30/2009 10:10 PM Deena wrote:
    I thought to myself Obama and ethics in the same sentence does not jive well does it? He is proving himself to live up to our expectations of disappointment already. Imagine his first accomplishment in office might be to put us into 800+ billion dollars more in debt with stimulus for everyone else's benefit except us taxpayers. Imagine this is after 10 days, we have 1450 more Obama days.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.