Should The World Health Organization Tax Your Internet?
Will Obama Agree To The Tax On Americans?
The World Health Organization (WHO) is moving full speed ahead with a controversial plan to impose billions of dollars in global consumer taxes on such things as Internet activity and everyday financial transactions like paying bills online. What do they have to do with the internet?
The goal of this taxing plan is to raise "tens of billions" of dollars for WHO that would be used to radically reorganize the research, development, production and distribution of medicines around the world, with greater emphasis on drugs for communicable diseases in poor countries.
The irony is that the WHO push to take a huge bite out of global consumers comes as the organization is having a management crisis of its own, juggling finances, failing to use its current resources efficiently, or keep its costs under control — and it doesn't expect to show positive results in managing those challenges until a year from now, at the earliest.
The proposals are headed for the four-day annual meeting of the 193-member World Health Assembly, WHO's chief legislative organ, which begins in Geneva on May 17. What it all means is that a major lobbying effort could soon be underway to convince rich governments in particular to begin taxing citizens or industries to finance a drastic restructuring of medical research and development on behalf of poorer ones.
In effect, the plan amounts to a pharmaceutical version of the U.N.-sponsored climate-change deal that failed to win global approval at Copenhagen last December. If implemented as the experts suggest, it could easily involve the same kind of wealth transfers as the failed Copenhagen summit, which will send $30 billion a year to poor nations, starting this year.
The rationale for the drastic restructuring of medical R and D, as outlined in the group of experts' report, is the skewed nature of medical research in the developed world, which concentrates largely on non-communicable diseases, notably cancer, and scants research on malaria, tuberculosis and other communicable scourges of poor countries. It cites a 1986 study that claimed that only 5 percent of global health research and development was applied to the health problems of developing countries.
(In dissecting contemporary medical R and D, however, the expert report glosses over the historical fact that many drugs for fighting communicable diseases in developing countries are already discovered; the issue in many cases is the abysmal living and hygienic conditions that make them easily transmitted killers.)
What truly concerns the experts, however, is how to get the wealth transfers that will make the R and D transfers possible — on a permanent basis. The panel offers up a specific number of possibilities.
Chief among them:
• A "digital" or "bit" tax on Internet activity, which could raise "tens of billions of U.S. dollars";
• A 10 percent tax on international arms deals, "worth about $5 billion per annum";
• A financial transaction tax, citing a Brazilian levy that was raising some $20 billion per year until it was canceled (for unspecified reasons);
• An airline tax that already exists in 13 countries and has raised some $1 billion.
Will Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrats say NO to this income redistribution? They are still solidly behind the Copenhagen wealth transfer scheme called global warming. Obama thinks we Americans are greedy and arrogant. Obama will support this fleecing of Americans.
Comment here and email us at YourVoice@speaknowamerica.org.
Visit MomsAndDadsBeHeard a forum for you to express your views and concerns. Be part of bringing our Great Christian country back.
Speak Now America! we want to hear from you
You might also like to read this article: Obama Wants More Government Hiring



I like your posting very much, it's informative. Keep sharing.
Reply to this
I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your web site to check out the latest stuff you post.
Reply to this
No i dont think this would help out.
medical assistant
Reply to this