Obama “We can absorb a terrorist attack.”

Along with ineptness and the inability to lead Barack Hussein Obama has at least one more thing in common with Jimmy Carter.  Like Carter Obama resents the American people he was elected to lead.

In Bob Woodward’s new book, Obama is quoted as saying “We can absorb a terrorist attack.” With this Woodward reveals in stark clarity Obama’s ambivalence and reluctance to prosecute a war against terrorists who organize against us, let alone the governments that give them safe harbor and support. We have a Commander-in-Chief unwilling to command or protect, whether our own southern border or the nation as a whole. He is willfully derelict in these duties, and if this means you and I and our families must occasionally “absorb” another 9-11 or worse, so be it. When the bodies are taken away and buried, and the debris is cleared, we can always build a mosque.

Deplorable as it is, Obama has no such ambivalence about his war on the ambitious, the achievers, the job-creators, and the affluent. His entire presidency is about this, as punishment not pragmatism. He is not a fool; he knows the destruction he wreaks.

Obama’s health care reform is, as administration insiders have admitted, a scheme to re-distribute wealth. As was his GM rescue, in which bondholders and stockholders were robbed in favor of union interests, and dealership-family business owners were callously “executed,” in a demonstration of his re-distributive power.

Examine every Obama initiative and you will find, at its core, re-distribution of wealth a blatantly un-American concept. It is rooted in communism and socialism, not democracy. When merchandised not as the evil it is but as “economic justice,” it can be made temporarily popular with masses, especially if they are having their own financial lives deliberately destroyed. That’s how to create not just the desire but desperate need for a seemingly benevolent dictator who will put a chicken in every pot and an electric car in every garage. Hmmm I’ve heard this pitch before.

Carter’s toothy smile cannot hide his rank bitterness about being broadly viewed as a failure America said “Good riddance” to rather than “Thank you.” He’s angry at what he sees as the stubborn stupidity of the American public, too damn dumb to understand the superiority of his policies and his leadership.

 Obama displays the same arrogance and the same pique with the stupidity of the public. His administration has suggested the need for “re-education” of the majority of Americans who reject Obamacare.  They haven’t mentioned rounding up people for incarceration in camps (a tactic of other regimes that share his philosophies). At least not yet.

At a town hall, when an articulate woman explains why she is, “exhausted” with defending the hope ‘n change guy she voted for, Obama lectures her about credit card regulations.  He shows his toothiest grin, just like Carter did.   For both the grin is masking rage. Like Carter, he sees himself as a miraculously successful president getting no credit from ignorant masses for his legislative successes.

Like Carter, what Obama can't grasp is that the American public does not score them based on percentage of agenda enacted, but by the beneficial or destructive outcome of what they enact. Historically, Americans have repeatedly established that, while it may be briefly fooled, it ultimately rejects policies of theft, of socialism, of destruction. It rejects arrogant would-be dictators who exhibit disdain for the citizenry.

Which party are you going to vote for in 31 days? The Paycheck Party or the Food Stamp Party?

Comment here and email us at YourVoice@speaknowamerica.org.

Visit MomsAndDadsBeHeard a forum for you to express your views and concerns. Be part of bringing our Great Christian country back.

Speak Now America! we want to hear from you